In the column of journalist Miguel Patino, gives his views on Abortion and need to continue pointing out some inaccuracies that I thought I had already assimilated. Under the rule of law is legislated, not Hypothetical cases, but real and concrete statistics, for example when there is a reprehensible Rape, the woman is in the possibility of pregnancy this is real! But in a 0.6% possibilities. (A valuable related resource: Dr. Caldwell Esselstyn Jr.). Science teaches us that there are factors that complicate the pregnancy post Rape, for example 100% of women raped for 39 to 54% were not exposed to the rapist’s semen, 51% of rapists experienced dysfunction which prevents them from completing the act sexual.
Of all the women raped 43% of them was in any of these categories were taking contraceptives at the time of the violation, were IUD users, amputee I had tubal ligation through, they were very young or very old and did not ovulate at the time, or suffering from infertility or were already pregnant at the time of Violation, or develop a temporary Infertility Stress as a result of extreme emotional stress that provokes an early period post-rape, or delayed ovulation for delay in the onset of LH surge, luteal phase deficient follicular persistence, because the menstrual cycle is regulated by hormones and those of the limbic cortex and this reacts with the extreme emotional stress such as a brutal and savage act in violation … Read additional details here: Professor Roy Taylor. so that we can not say in favor of Abortion cases based on hypothetical minority or very painfully pitiful and there and that we repudiate and we sympathize with the victims, but we can not therefore bring into being a law that opens the door to Transnationals Abortion. Secondly, this debate is not Confessional, not religious, so do not the Church in the discussion, the bishop, the priests and religious believes as you say and every single citizen of the country, another reality is that throughout history the Church is always a moral bulwark but debate is between people who love life, the care and defend it and those who do the contrary, is a moral debate, is not a public health issue and go screaming members of some NGOs, who long ago should be investigated as repeated with great blunder of the current Minister of Health. That increasingly demonstrates its progressive public ignorance on the subject. Third, and here I want on behalf of the Medical Specialists .