The Dream of God One day God had a dream. This age to recriar the universe and the Land, and to place a similar being there it, who could take care of and watch over of the planet. This dream was materialize, God recriou the Land and the universe and made a similar being it, the Man, it put and it to take care of and to watch over of the Land. However Mr. Deus did not want an automatic being, but yes one to be with proper will and proper thoughts, therefore he gave to the free man will so that he could choose and think by itself. Then the man enjoyed of full communion with God, the proper one came all the afternoons to have with the name man Adam. One day the man forgot what God had commanded to it, that did not eat of the fruit of the way it garden where liveed. Northland for more clarity on the issue. Therefore certainly the day where it ate of this fruit would die.
Eating of the forbidden fruit the man it breached with the alliance that had with God, I privilege lost it to talk with Mr. face the face, a barrier between God was created and the Man this barrier if it calls sin, or simply disobedience. But Mr. Deus wanted to rescue this alliance with the man, being thus Mr. Deus, the Dream of the Rescue starts again plus a Dream, this Rescue had that to be perfect as everything that It creates to put did not only depend ON It, but also on the will of the man of being rescued. Of this form he creates you some alliances in elapsing of the time, however the man with its pecaminosa nature goes breaking with passing of the times until It creates then a new perfect and definitive alliance, the New Alliance through the Lamb of God.
67-8). The questions raised for Jose Comblin are pertinent also for the protestant Christian churches. In certain way, these consideraes exceed the borders of the Church. They they run away for the scope of the secular culture, of which the Church also is part. The necessity of the Church is seen here to rethink the evangelizao concept. In what it says respect to the field of the Anthropology and the Ethics, the mission of the understood Church only as practical proselitistas, will be able to have serious implications. After all, what it is in game are not only the religious choices that somebody can make, but to be before, the possibility of the disappearance of cultures, religions, customs, languages, at last, of the proper history of a people.
Thus, ahead of these implications in the field of the mission, the theologian Jose Comblin presents following the proposal: ' ' The mission cannot be one ' ' obrigao' '. If ' will be one; ' obrigao' ' , never it will be efficient. It will only convince if to proceed from the heart of the Christians, spontaneously. This assumes that the laypeople feel its Christianity not as a duty, an obligation for the salvation, but a promotion human being, a better and more harmonious life. Nobody goes to consider to others something that does not appreciate. The first Christians if had converted for having sensible as the life of them had moved when they had entered in the way of Jesus' ' (COMBLIN, 2005. P. 70-1).
Jose Comblin speaks here of mission in the evangelizao direction. It is truth well that the evangelizao is part also of the field of the mission. However, the mission does not restrict only the evangelizao. She is necessary to distinguish between mission (in the singular) and missions (in the plural one). The first concept sends the missio Dei (mission of God) (BOSCH, 2002, P.