Human Sciences

Result, it does not say anything! It is why it takes refuge, like all the writers, after the complexity of the man. Estudiar the phosphorus, it is well! To analyze the lambs, is a little more difficult, but, compared a man, a lamb, it is much more simple. As far as the man, this he is much more complicated, subtler, finer! . I was there from my professional race until I had, does about twenty years, the surprising opportunity to find Jean Gagnepain, and to turn to me into one of its disciples. Quickly I learned that to preach a true knowledge on the man it supposed that we demolish the main obstacles to arrive this new knowledge, beginning by its famous Faculties of Letters and Human Sciences. Indeed, if, for example, they go away to the Renaissance will be able to state that the humanism could not take it but until they were under the feat of Rabelais and company, the lock of the Sorbona was obstructed. But, at that time, Sorbonicolegiales of was exactly equal yesterday to those of now, looked for to reform, to adapt. But there were others, more shone that they included/understood that all reform was already the condemned: another thing could not be done.

This is exactly what Jean Gagnepain had understood. In the time in the humanism it finishes and it begins anti humanism, that is to say the one of the treatment of the man by the man who presides to the sprouting of a true Science of the man, is time to take brings back to consciousness of the main obstacle at the beginning of this new era. The problem of the formation, not only for morning, but already also for today, happened through the liquidation of the writers. It is certain that if literate the present ones became enemies, this succeeded after to have been the most beautiful florero of the University humanist.