The words of president Hugo Chavez, to prepare itself for the war, within the framework of a warlike scene that him weapon to the country in their Colombian border, has initiated a true process of patriotic movement. Far from argumentation facilista competing in question of smoke screen to conceal yearning eternal of his dreams, that is to say, that Chvez is fallen (broad that sounds since it arrived at the power), is a new presidential axe blow on brings back to consciousness of country that it has or it has to have a Venezuelan against the eventuality of an external aggression, brings back to consciousness by the way seriously injured in the case of the competing mind, for that they did not seem to exist foreign threats by any side, but internal problems that repel directly on their liberal definition. That is to say, on its capitalist approach of conception of the life, its money, its individualism rayante in the egoism, its stingy deprived property, its constitution interpreted to its way, in short, its press, freedom and equality like factors historical of definition bourgeois, takes who it to smell like sulphur everything what tolerates changes in its damage. Bond to say, on its condition bourgeois. Because a bourgeois is that: tried he brings back to consciousness of sufficiency and autonomy over kingdoms (if we spoke of its origin) and States, last situation this that takes to the interpretation of which another thing concerns a cumin to him to happen over the right of the others with so safeguard its prebandage (is not the State: the confluence of the right of all). Neither the more nor the less, the Venezuelan political opposition, openly enemy of the process of changes of articles of incorporation that practices in the country, del that it interprets goes against its traditional and individualizantes interests.
What distinguishes man from other species of flora and fauna of the earth? Let theologians arguing about the presence of the souls of animals, let biologists investigate the degree of intelligence of apes and dolphins, one difference is established firmly: no is not only useful but essential goals. No wonder at the royal courts for centuries introduced public office the court jester, in an ironic reminiscent of the court and the king, that any reason, there may be another point of view. As a rule, the Fool was a clever and tactful man, as a bad joke is often lost their lives. Smile, laugh as a prototype, there was a few tens of thousands of years ago and served as welcome sign, security, reliability, security, satisfaction with life. When we want to support and cheer the other person, we smile, joke around, tell jokes, show the comic situation. But as people are able to distinguish from the unfunny funny, make a humorous story to amuse others? What is a logical sequence of action should follow a man? What are the neurophysiological and psychological mechanisms of laughter? Exploration of these issues are addressed in this work.
What is the role of laughter today? First of all, this tool is directed to favorable resolution of a tension adapting to the changed situation, prevention of aggression and conflict, stress (positive emotions when watching comedy TV shows). Note, however, that any tool can be used and in harm to humans. For example, excessive use of humor in educational programs for the transition to ridicule, which may cause the object of ridicule and feelings of inferiority as a consequence of aggression. Humor and laughter is one of the key methods of income generation, both in the form of payment for positive emotions (various humorous representations and rides, games) as well as an association with positive emotions (like ads in the comic performances, humorous situations in the promotional material). We should also highlight anti-advertising, the formation of negative view of persons, by the phenomena of satire, cartoons, songs and other artistic styles (remember immortal "Ministry of Health warns …"). Irony plays a big role in educating, assisting the formation of logical concepts about new things, a critical revision of the views and opinions, the destruction of inappropriate stereotypes of life – rights as an author, writer, poet, artist, actor, that is, as a creative personality.